Hitler Reacts to BYU's win, and Apologizes to Max Hall.
(These videos are satires and responses to the video from last season,"Hitler Reacts to BYU Loss." )
Hitler Reacts to Max Hall's Comments.
Read More >>>
Hitler Reacts to BYU's win, and Apologizes to Max Hall.
(These videos are satires and responses to the video from last season,"Hitler Reacts to BYU Loss." )
Hitler Reacts to Max Hall's Comments.




Both BYU and Utah State are trying to prove everyone wrong this week...
21
The number 21 is the connection that both the BYU vs Oklahoma and the Utah State vs Utah games share. 21 is the betting line for both games, with Utah State and BYU being the underdogs in each. Yet, it is hard to think that BYU is as far away from Oklahoma as Utah State is from Utah.
Utah State probably has a much better chance of beating Utah than BYU has beating Oklahoma. Look back at the Aggies season a year ago, and you will notice that they weren't that far away from a 5-7 season. While you might be saying, "What is the big deal? 3-9 or 5-7, both are pretty bad." Yes, both are poor records to have as a team, but there is a big difference between barely 3-9 and a disappointing 3-9. The Aggies had the talent last season to be a 5-7 team, and try to push to find a way to get a sixth all important win.
The majority of the contributing players that the Aggies had last season are back this season. They have a solid running back in Robert Turbin, and a proven play maker in Diondre Borel. The defense should be better, although the defensive line could still use some serious work. The other difference that the Aggies have, which will make a difference, is a change in attitude. It is clear to anyone watching the Aggies practice that there is a different mentality among the team. Gary Anderson has brought in a culture of accountability, discipline, and hope.
In regards to the Utah game, Utah State has the competitive advantage in that Utah has no idea what to expect from the Aggies. While at the same time Gary Anderson knows Utah's defense inside and out. Anderson has done everything that he can to keep a tight lid on the changes he is implementing in Logan. He is restricting the media's access to his players, practices, and even limiting what he showed to fans at the final fall scrimmage. Gary Anderson could have some surprises in store for his old team, when he makes his return to Rice-Eccles stadium.
Utah State is improved this season, but Utah might be a little overrated from last season. Utah is still a very good football team; however, they have lost some key skill players. Brian Johnson really made the offense work last season, and his loss along with Darrell Mack will hurt the productivity of the offense. Yet, the biggest loss for Utah is Paul Kruger. The most influential position on defense in college football is defensive end. A good defensive end will change a college football game. If you think otherwise, just look back at last year's BYU vs Utah game. Kruger almost single handily shut down Max Hall in that game. Kruger was a player that other teams had to game plan for, and always know where he was on the field. Utah has some good talent on defense, but they don't have another Paul Kruger.
Utah is trying to retool their offense on the run, and rely on their defense to carry them in their first few games. This is the biggest advantage, and chance that Utah State has in their opening game. If Gary Anderson's knowledge of Utah's defense can establish a weakness that the Aggies could exploit, then Utah State could get into a higher scoring game which would give them a chance to outscore a newly tooled Utah offense.
While Utah is good, but rebuilding; Oklahoma is great,they are coming back from a National Title Game loss, and the majority of their skill players are coming back. They have a Heisman Trophy winner, arguably the best front seven on defense ever in college football, and a stable full of tall athletic wide receivers. Oklahoma has little to no question marks going into the season, they are only worried about a possible injury derailing their chances of beating Texas and returning to the National Championship game.
BYU on the other hand ended last season on a huge low note. Max Hall turned into an interception/fumbling machine. Unga disappeared from the offense. The secondary was a complete joke. Plus, the four out of five offensive linemen graduated from school. The offensive line and secondary were the major concerns coming into the new season for BYU, and surprisingly enough there are more questions and concerns about the offensive line and secondary today than at the beginning of camp.
Three offensive linemen who were thought to contribute this season are injured: Matt Reynolds, Houston Reynolds, and Jason Speredon, although Matt Reynolds may return for the Oklahoma game.
The secondary is a pure mystery. The athletes in the secondary are better this season, than last year's secondary. Yet, the top four secondary guys are all fighting injuries, and another member of the secondary, Garett Nicholson, didn't qualify for school.
BYU has their work cut out for them against the Sooners. The only real chance that BYU has in their opening game is to control the clock. BYU would have to turn to their ground attack to keep the ball out of Sam Bradford's hands. Even if BYU were to make the game low scoring, and control the time of possession, it is very unlikely that they will win.
BYU needs to hope that they will at least be in striking distance at the end of the game, and hope that one of the new players can step up and have a breakout game. The one weakness that the Sooners do have, is they are trying to replace members of their secondary. If BYU can stay close, they could take advantage of the Sooners' secondary in the end.
Is it a long shot for both BYU and Utah State? Yes. Can both teams still have successful seasons even if they lose their opening game? Yes. Could both teams win their openers? It would shock some people, but it isn't impossible. There is a reason that teams actually play the game on the field and not on paper.
A breakdown of the rest of the Jazz season...
In episode 15 we discuss:
BYU loses again, nothing new...
Texas A&M 79 BYU 66, no big surprise.
It seems to be like day light savings. Set your clock ahead, watch BYU choke in the conference tournament, and then watch them exit in the first round of the NCAA tournament. BYU hasn't gotten a "good" draw for many years; however, that isn't an excuse. Other teams are able to overcome a bad seed, poor play location, or even hostile crowds. Yet, BYU isn't able to overcome. The brighter the lights the quicker that BYU falters.
This year, BYU never got their game going. BYU went down early, and didn't seem to fight back. Sure Texas A&M were hitting big shots, but BYU wasn't doing anything to disrupt the streak of Texas A&M's shotting. How many free throws did A&M shot in the first half? Four, with two of those in the first nineteen minutes. That is it. If a team is on fire, "let see how many shots they can make on their back?" In a tournament teams just can't play soft, but that is BYU's M.O.
It wouldn't be a big deal for BYU if this year was something out of the ordinary. Nope, BYU has played the same type of game every year. Texas A&M came out of the gate last year and went up 11, and BYU couldn't overcome. Xavier couldn't miss from the outside, and BYU didn't do anything to slow them down. BYU actually got off to a big lead against Syracuse before Gerry McNamara caught fire and lead his team to a victory.
From the start of the season it was obvious that the BYU system of basketball is a hit or miss business. If BYU's outside shot is falling they can hang with anyone in the country. This can be seen in both the Arizona State and Wake Forest games this season. BYU had a lead, but couldn't maintain the lead once the shots stopped falling.
BYU system of offense seems to be almost at the level of a gimmick. The gimmick that is used by BYU ensures that they can compete year in year out in the Mountain West Conference. BYU can plug in your standard BYU player and succeed, but have trouble when it comes to any tournament.
1993, 1993 looms large in BYU's basketball fans minds. 1993 was the last time that BYU won a tournament game. That date will have to be burned into the mind of every BYU fan for another year at least for BYU to get another shot at erasing the date.
A look at Utah teams and their tournament hopes...
Utah State - If you are a fan of the Aggies it was a shot to the gut to see USU get an 11 seed. Yet, another example of how few teams outside of the "Major Conferences" got any respect. It also meant that if the Aggies didn't win their conference tournament they would have been on the outside looking into the tournament. With that in mind, the Aggies need to be smiling when they view where and who they are playing. The Aggies drew an injured Marquette team that didn't finish the season well, and they are playing at Boise. The closest that the Aggies could get to playing a home game. Then to look out a little further on the bracket, the Aggies potential second round opponent would be Missouri. The weakest of all the three seeds in the tournament. The Aggies might have drawn a low seed, but the table is set for them to march into the sweet sixteen and prove that they were underrated.
Utah - A five seed! I still can't get over the surprise of when I heard that the Utes gained a five seed in the tournament. Utah didn't finish the season well. They were in the driver seat for the conference and ended up with a three way tie for the regular season title. The Utes then barely got by TCU, and played San Diego State to the buzzer to win the conference tournament (Which also makes San Diego State's omission from the field that much more insulting to the "Mid-Major" Conferences). Yet, the committee thought that the play of the Utes earned them merit, and they ended up with a five seed. Or in other words the committee believes that Utah is one of the twenty best teams in all of college basketball...huh? The Utes did have a high RPI, but I think what helped them most was having their AD on the selection committee. It helps to have friends in high places. The location of the play for Utah is not good. The Utes must travel to Miami to play their games. An insult to any five seed that they must travel across the country. Especially when a higher seed normally means that they get a location closer to their university to play. Utah is a two point underdog to Arizona, another slap in the face of a five seed. The Utes should beat 'Zons, but face a stiff second round challenge playing Wake Forest back east in the second round.
BYU - Another year, another terrible draw for BYU. Once again BYU is playing on the East Coast. They are playing in the early contests, meaning that BYU will be playing at 10:30am local time. BYU is also in a rematch with last year's opponent Texas A&M. A&M's seeding is interesting, and would be hard to explain (as many of the selection committee's decisions are equally perplexing). The Aggies were the fourth best team in the Big 12, but they are seed lower than both Texas and Oklahoma State, both teams that finished below them in the regular season. The Aggies have quick guards that give have given BYU trouble guarding in the past. Also even if the Cougars were to win their first tournament game of the new millennium, BYU would have to face UConn in UConn's backyard. If BYU's shots are falling they can beat anyone, and they will need those shots to fall if they want to win any tournament games this season.
A Link heavy edition of the links/videos...
An article from the Houston Chronicle that describes the atmosphere in Utah for a Jazz game. http://sports.espn.go.com/espn/columns/story?columnist=wojciechowski_gene&id=3391439&sportCat=nba
Lee Cummard declared for the draft, and I thought it was a bad idea; however, Rivals.com disagrees. Here is an article rating the top 5/bottom 5 underclassmen that are declaring for the NBA draft. http://collegebasketball.rivals.com/content.asp?CID=804790
With officiating being questionable during the Jazz/Lakers series I thought this blog entry was very interesting listening the Jazz record when certain officials are doing the games. http://blogs.sltrib.com/jazz/2008/04/jazz-77-hornets-66.htm
If you are complaining about the officiating in the Lakers/Jazz series you aren't the only one. Here is an article from T.J. Simers, of the LA Times, voicing his shock about the officiating. http://www.latimes.com/sports/la-sp-simers8-2008may08,0,3590542.column
I have really liked reading Bill Plaschke of the LA Times as well during this series (and I think I will be following his writings more closely in the future). Here is an article about 'The Machine' Sasha Vujacic http://www.latimes.com/sports/la-sp-plaschke11-2008may11,0,4824274.column (His article about Kobe's game four performance, and about the Derek Fisher situation are also worth looking at. Looks like he is really more than a windbag on parade...sorry Al Michaels)
Here is a late addition, a good article by Gene Wojciechowski of ESPN.com about Larry H. Miller's day yesterday. http://sports.espn.go.com/espn/columns/story?columnist=wojciechowski_gene&id=3391439&sportCat=nba
Here is a video I have been saving. Check out this ping pong rally.
Thoughts on tournament selections...
BYU - Once again the failure of the Cougars to win the conference tournament kills the seed they could have received in the NCAA tournament. An eight seed (or a nine seed) is the kiss of death in the tournament. The committee matches up two teams that they think are even, and the winner has to play a rested one seed in the next round. Texas A&M is arguably the best nine seed in the tournament this year. The only thing working for the Cougars in the first round is the location, Anaheim is a much better location for the Cougars than going back East; however, if they do get by A&M the location turns against them when they will have to face UCLA in the second round. The Cougars still have to play the games, but the outlook doesn't look good for their first tournament win in fifteen years.
Utah - CBI. Before yesterday not many people in Utah knew what it stood for, but the Utes are headed for the inaugural College Basketball Invitational. Yes, there is yet another post season tournament. A chance to play for the right to be called the 97th best team in all of college basketball. The tournament will be held on the home courts of the teams. The significant change from the NIT and NCAA tournaments is the addition of the best of three format in the finals. While that is a progressive and interesting idea for college basketball, isn't the addition of another tournament watering down the basketball postseason in the same way the excess of bowl games waters down the football season? The post season should be something earned, the CBI rewards mediocrity. The Utes open the tournament Wednesday at UTEP.
USU - Jaycee Carroll won't get to showcase his talents in the NCAA tournament in his senior year. Carroll has carried the Aggies this entire season, to a share of the WAC regular season crown. The Aggies didn't have enough to beat the Boise St. Broncos in the Wac tournament. Carroll does have the chance to try and lead the Aggies to New York in the NIT. Making a run in the NIT would cap a great finish to a season that the Aggies began 3-4, and the college career of Carroll. Illinois State 24-9 will be a tough opening round game. The Redbirds only loss at home this season was #18 Drake, by just three points. Carroll really has his work cut out for him to make some noise in the NIT.
While the basketball was good the site was far from...
Considering only the basketball that was played, the 2008 Men's Mountain West Conference Tournament was a success. All games were exciting, and hard fought. The opening round included two games that were instant classics. (UNLV v TCU and New Mexico v Utah) Yet people aren't talking about the basketball that was played during the tournament, but what happened off the court. The brawl after the championship game marred a good weekend of basketball, and questions the logic of holding the event in Las Vegas.
Why is there a problem with holding the event in Vegas? Fairness to all of the teams in the conference is a major issuse with holding the tournament in Las Vegas. Taking down the banners and changing the logo at mid-court doesn't change the fact that UNLV is playing on their home court. At home over the last two years UNLV is 38-3. That is a huge advantage for the Rebels. Would it be fair for the tournament to be held in The Pit, The Marriott Center, The Huntsman Center, or any other teams' home court? No, if the tournament was held in Provo every year there would be an outcry in the conference. Playing on your home court is a home game regardless of changes made to the aesthetics, and it is an unfair advantage.
Security is also an issue. Last year UNLV rushing the court was viewed as harmful for the players, the coaches and the media. (The media not liking it was one of the reasons that this problem was such a big deal this year.) The conference tried to address this problem by using the public address announcer and a barrier constructed in front of the seats to prevent fans from storming the court. The problem with the crowd control was the event centers laissez-faire attitude in enforcing these standards. They didn't have security preventing people from rushing the court, but ushers, most of who were upwards for sixty years old.
The Thomas and Mack Center's belief that it is easier to control fans when they rush the court does make a lot of sense. The fans want to celebrate, and it is just a manner of getting the opposing team off the court in a speedy manner. The problem with this philosophy, by the Thomas and Mack Center, is they aren't the ones in charge of the event. They are being contracted by the Mountain West Conference, and it is their responsibility to uphold the standards of the conference. The conference decided they didn't want fans rushing the court, and there should have been a better plan in place to prevent the fans from doing so. This attitude by the Thomas and Mack Center shows they aren't good to work with and a new home should be sought.
There are two simple solutions that the Mountain West Conference should adopt for their tournament.
Plan A - Rotate the tournament to a different school each year. If the conference insists on playing the conference tournament in arenas affiliated with conference schools they should at least rotate it and give each school the opportunity to host. There would still be the bias of the home court advantage for one school each year; however, it wouldn't be the same school each year, making the advantage more even for the schools. The problem with this is it makes the tournament less fan friendly. Who wants to drive to Laramie and spend a long weekend?
Plan B - Hold the tournament in a neutral city. This is the best solution. Holding the tournament in Denver was the right idea, but it was the wrong location. The Pepsi Center wasn't fan friendly at all, they had to schedule around the Nuggets, and it was still a cold weather location. The conference needs to go south. Phoenix would be a great city to hold the tournament. It is a neutral site that is warm in March, and has a NBA arena to play in. It is centrally located for those who want to drive or fly down. It would also be good for recruiting in PAC-10 territory. Picking a city like Phoenix would solve the majority of problems that the tournament currently has.
Las Vegas has the contract for the Mountain West Tournament until 2010. (Wow! How many bad contracts can one conference sign?) They will also be competing starting next year with the West Coast Conference who will be playing their games in the New Orleans Arena, located on the strip. It is time for the conference to be proactive and make changes in the tournament that will benefit the conference, because the current situation isn't working.
Videos and Links for the Weekend...
A story about Scott Thornley winning Men's College Official of the year. (If the officiating in the Mountain West Conference is good, how terrible it is in other conferences.)
http://themwc.cstv.com/sports/m-baskbl/spec-rel/030508aab.html
Two interesting write ups about the New York Knicks' 2010 draft pick which the Utah Jazz own the rights to.
http://blogs.sltrib.com/jazz/2008/01/tuesday-report.htm
http://www.nydailynews.com/blogs/knicks/2008/01/knicks-could-lose-lottery-pick.html
Now some good videos for the weekend, including some classics.
A Funny Penalty Kick
An Official Celebration to the Midsection
PTI Trampoline Bear (In honor of Warren Sapp's retirement)
Dramatic Hamster (This one kills me every time)
Everything you need to know to be ready to watch the MWC tournament...
March is here and the NCAA tournament is about to begin. Before the start of the ultimate sports tournament comes the conference tournaments. The warm-ups to the bug dance. The Mountain West Conference tournament will take place March 11-15th in Las Vegas. With the regular season winding down there is some clarity of how the seeding for the tournament will shake out. (Here is a link to the tournament bracket showing the television coverage: http://themwc.cstv.com/auto_pdf/p_hotos/s_chools/mwc/sports/m-baskbl/auto_pdf/2008-mbb-tourney-bracket ) To get everyone up to speed here is a quick crash course guide to Mountain West Conference men's basketball.